Whereas, CiviCRM has the capability to allow SLEC access;
Whereas, Texas has 254 counties, 69 of which are affiliated, 4 officers, and 26 staffers that compose a large pool of people we are already planning to give various levels of access to CiviCRM;
Whereas, district representatives have been duly elected by their districts and have been charged by LPTexas Bylaw iV.a.6.V to “actively work to further the growth of the Party. This includes, but is not limited to, communicating current organizational status within their districts to the Party, communicating Party information to their districts, assisting with candidate recruitment efforts, developing county affiliates, oversight of Party administration, and assisting to ensure proper function of official Party events.”;
Whereas, a binding policy passed by SLEC would take a lot of effort to craft and would be wholly inflexible to changing times, changing circumstances, and unforeseen events;
Whereas, SLEC would rather see a common-sense approach taken by executives to day-to-day management, if possible, for the reasons listed prior;
Therefore, be it resolved that in lieu of a binding policy the SLEC officially wishes and respectfully requests that district representatives of the SLEC be granted access to the data covering individuals within their districts with similar permissions to those planned for county leadership.
