Let’s cease the casting of aspersions on the intentions and actions of committee members. This committee is made up of individuals who have no experience planning conventions before, and while that is not an excuse for anything, it certainly means that some processes need to be refined. I have the most convention/conference/event planning experience (nearly 20 years) of anyone in this state affiliate, yet I have not been consulted about any of it. Let’s be careful about accusing people of tipping scales and undermining processes.
I will also say that there is absolutely no reason that anyone on the committee should NOT have been working to get the best possible options for LPTexas. It is also my understanding that the committee’s vote on the matter was postponed multiple times to allow committee members to get better proposals from their assigned venues. The decision point is (has been) upon us and we need to take everything relevant from these options into consideration.
If a venue adjusts its proposal to better suit us and make themselves more appealing, that is not someone on our end “alter[ing] the bids after-the-fact”.
The Chair of the committee, who happens to also be our Events Director, has every right (and duty) to work with prospects to secure the best offers and get accurate and reliable information in order to bring the best possible options to us for consideration. And she should certainly have the committee’s blessing to do so. That is her job.